Evaluating the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme
What did the evaluation of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme find, and what does that show about this data use?
Read this first: A paper that measures a programme's outcomes is evidence about the programme. It does not show that the data use, or the evaluation, caused those outcomes.
Stage 1: Data access (evidence held)
5 versions in NHS England's register.
Stage 2: Research output (evidence held)
4 papers quote the reference; 0 not yet reviewed.
- Age- and deprivation-related inequalities in identification of people at high risk of type 2 diabetes in England. (Paper quotes an agreement reference; human verified): “…-identification of NDH. Methods Data and populations We used pseudo-anonymised, routinely collected data from the NDA Core and NDH components of the National Diabetes Audit Core module [ 16 ], obtained from NHS Digital (DARS-NIC-196221-K4K3Y). This was part of the DIPLOMA research project which ha…”
- Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of the English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme using a Markov Model. (Paper quotes an agreement reference; human verified): “…ts of the programme are considered commercially sensitive, and the author is not permitted to share this data. The National Diabetes Audit data used in this study was obtained upon application to NHS Digital (reference: DARS-NIC-196221-K4K3Y). The author is not permitted to share this data. The us…”
- Population level impact of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme on incidence of type 2 diabetes in England: An observational study. (Paper quotes an agreement reference; human verified): “…t)). They have no other financial or personal relationships to declare. Acknowledgments Data sharing statement The National Diabetes Audit data used in this study was obtained upon application to NHS Digital (reference: DARS-NIC-196221-K4K3Y). The authors are not permitted to share this data. The…”
- Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England. (Paper quotes an agreement reference; human verified): “…arch Ethics Committee (Reference no 15/EE/0229). Survey data are available here https://ukdataservice.ac.uk . The National Diabetes Audit data used in this study were obtained upon application to NHS Digital (reference: DARS-NIC-196221-K4K3Y). The authors are not permitted to share this data. The…”
Stage 3: Later trials (not established)
No ClinicalTrials.gov registration found that cites these papers.
Stage 4: Policy and guidance (not established)
No GOV.UK page found whose text cites these papers. Attached PDFs are not searched.
Stage 5: Claimed downstream impact (not established)
No impact claim held here cites these papers.
Stage 6: Independent corroboration (not established)
No reviewer has confirmed the claimed impact from an independent source.
Stage 7: Measured outcome (not established)
No reviewed evaluation measures an outcome attributable to this data use.
What remains unknown
- Whether the evaluation changed the programme: no NHS England decision document citing it has been found or imported.
- The outcome measured is the programme's effect; recording it as such needs a reviewer to assert a "research evaluated a programme" link from the paper's own methods.