OpenHDI · Open Health Data Impact

Surgery in England during COVID-19, and the trial that cites it

Did national analyses of surgery during the pandemic feed into later clinical research?

Read this first: A trial registration citing these papers shows they were part of its background. It does not show the trial was designed because of them, or that either changed surgical practice.

Stage 1: Data access (evidence held)

1 version in NHS England's register.

Stage 2: Research output (evidence held)

5 papers quote the reference; 0 not yet reviewed.

Stage 3: Later trials (evidence held)

1 registered trial cite or list these papers; 2 links not yet reviewed. Citing a paper does not mean a trial arose from it.

Stage 4: Policy and guidance (not established)

No GOV.UK page found whose text cites these papers. Attached PDFs are not searched.

    Stage 5: Claimed downstream impact (not established)

    No impact claim held here cites these papers.

      Stage 6: Independent corroboration (not established)

      No reviewer has confirmed the claimed impact from an independent source.

        Stage 7: Measured outcome (not established)

        No reviewed evaluation measures an outcome attributable to this data use.

          What remains unknown

          • Whether the trial's design relied on these findings: the registration lists them as background only.
          • Guideline or policy use: no source for surgical guidance or NHS recovery planning citations is imported yet.
          • The trial's own results: not yet published or not yet listed on its registration.